By James Wastasecoot
Let’s be clear about the path we’re on in terms of an evolving governance model in Peguis. Broadly speaking and upon reference to our policies, specifically the Financial Administration Law, we can say that we’re on the path to democracy. A recent exchange with councillor Sinclair offered a stark reminder of the fragile state of democratic norms in Peguis. Following my editorial on Peguis Child and Family Services in January, she responded:
"Next time you add my name in the paper, ask me first."
At first glance, the request may seem benign, even reasonable. But at its core, it reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of democracy and the role of a free press. Imagine if such a rule were applied across Peguis. If our newspaper were required to seek permission before reporting critically on councillors or other public figures, we would cease to be a free press.
A press that submits to the approval of the powerful is no longer independent—it becomes a tool of censorship, restricting the public’s right to know. The moment journalists must ask permission to publish the truth, the system tilts away from democracy and toward oligarchy, where power is concentrated in the hands of a few, shielded from scrutiny.
This is not the governance model envisioned in the Financial Administration Law, Peguis’ governance policies, or its access-to-information rules. These frameworks are designed to ensure transparency, accountability, and an informed public—principles that underpin any functioning democracy.
A free press does not exist to serve those in power. It exists to serve the people. If Peguis is to move forward as a self-determining nation, its leaders—and its citizens—must understand that democracy is not about controlling the narrative. It is about ensuring that the truth, no matter how uncomfortable, remains accessible to all.
A fascinating topic, democracy is. If you’re interested, tune into any of the American channels on TV and see a democracy that is being dismantled.
